Skiffy.wordpress.com

…has moved to skiffy.ca

Review: Star Trek XI

This article has moved here.

May 12, 2009 - Posted by | movies, REDIRECTED

6 Comments »

  1. Why do they do that? Write an alternate universe? It was all a dream? Pretend it never happened?

    All the really GOOD stuff happens when you take what IS and build on it.

    Tell me how many of us really want to know the back-story … tell me again, ma … tell me about the time Kirk and Spock met for the first time …

    ::Sigh::

    Comment by Medzilla | June 6, 2009 | Reply

    • I hear ya, Sparky. I shook my head in sadness, too. (What I would have given for a DS9 movie instead.) But you know why they did it: because a whole lot of unthinking people just like their movies with throwaway lines, supermodel actors, and shit that blows up real good.

      Comment by raywat | June 6, 2009 | Reply

  2. […] reviewed Star Trek here. It’s a fine action movie. But it’s neither science fiction nor clever. If it […]

    Pingback by The 2010 Hugos « Skiffy.ca | April 5, 2010 | Reply

  3. […] my review of the new Star Trek movie? Recall that it’s a JJ Abrams project, much like two of my favourite TV shows: Lost and […]

    Pingback by deonandia » Until I Have Time For a REAL Post… | June 10, 2012 | Reply

  4. […] reviewed Star Trek here. It’s a fine action movie. But it’s neither science fiction nor clever. If it […]

    Pingback by deonandia » Jimmy Carter and the Hugos | December 26, 2013 | Reply

  5. […] reviewed Star Trek here. It’s a fine action movie. But it’s neither science fiction nor clever. If it […]

    Pingback by The 2010 Hugos | Skiffy.ca | January 2, 2014 | Reply


Leave a comment